CO129-193 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [5-7] — Page 426

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

I clear it must have been stopped somewhere and the evidence, together with the extracts I have quoted prove that it was not stopped by sand; there must therefore have been some other cause of stoppage, and it is impossible to conceive any other than the one viz:- states by Wt Bowsher and Mitratto, the two cover stones found by them so placed in the drain as to make it absolutely impossible that they could have come there by any means but human hands. The storm could never have placed them there in that position. The result of this obstruction was to divert nearly the whole of the water to the surface of the ground and to lead it into the "basement floor of the house, which is at a lower level than the surrounding ground, whence it descends or percolates downwards through interstices of the boulders of which the embankment is made into the drain below. This percolation was well defined by the circular eddies or whirlpool marks left on the sand which overlay the basement floor after the waters subsided, and it was quite clear that the percolation had melted and washed downward the earth in the boulder interstices and so caused the cracks in the house.

14. Briefly the main points for the Government are the following:

(1.) that it can be mathematically proven the smaller Belmont drain can carry off over three times the amount of water that was let into it during the storm by all tributary drains.

(ii) that the Belmont drain was not stopped through...

422/05

Edit History

2026-05-22 11:04:46 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
I clear it must have been stopped somewhere and the evidence, together with the extracts I have quoted prove that it was not stopped by sand; there must therefore have been some other cause of stoppage, and it is impossible to conceive any other than the one viz:- states by Wt Bowsher and Mitratto, the two cover stones found by them so placed in the drain as to make it absolutely impossible that they could have come there by any means but human hands. The storm could never have placed them there in that position. The result of this obstruction was to divert nearly the whole of the water to the surface of the ground and to lead it into the "basement floor of the house, which is at a lower level than the surrounding ground, whence it descends or percolates downwards through interstices of the boulders of which the embankment is made into the drain below. This percolation was well defined by the circular eddies or whirlpool marks left on the sand which overlay the basement floor after the waters subsided, and it was quite clear that the percolation had melted and washed downward the earth in the boulder interstices and so caused the cracks in the house. 14. Briefly the main points for the Government are the following: (1.) that it can be mathematically proven the smaller Belmont drain can carry off over three times the amount of water that was let into it during the storm by all tributary drains. (ii) that the Belmont drain was not stopped through... 422/05
Baseline (Original)
I clear it must have been stopper somewhere and the evidence, together with the extracts I have quotes prove that it was not stopped by sand; there must therefore have been some other of stoppage, and it is impossible other than the one cause to conceive viz:- any states by Wt Bowsher and Mitratto, the two cover stones foun's by. them so places in the drain as to make it absolutely impossible they by that position by Certainly any means but human hands. could have come the storm could never have placed them there in that position. The result of this obstruction was to divert nearly the whole the water. of the A to the surface of the ground and to lead it into the "basement the house floor of which is at a lower level than the surrounding ground, whence it descencer or percolates downwards 422/05 through interstices of the bouliers of which the embankment, is mail into the drain below. This percolation the was well defined by the circular Eddies. whirlport marks left Loft sand which overlay the basement floo after the waters subsides, and it was quite clear that the perculation had meltes and washer downward the earth in the boulier interstices and so causes the cracks in the house. 14. Briefly regares the case are the following: the main points مان for the Government (1.) that it can be mathematically prover the smaller Belmont drain carr carry off over three times the amount of wate. that was les into it du storm by during the all tributary drains. (ii) that the Belmont drain was through not
2026-05-22 11:04:46 · Baseline
View content

I

clear it must have been stopper somewhere and the evidence, together with the extracts I have quotes prove that it was not stopped by sand; there must therefore have been some other

of stoppage, and it is impossible

other than the one

cause

to conceive

viz:-

any

states by Wt Bowsher and Mitratto,

the two cover stones foun's by. them so places in the drain as to make it absolutely impossible they by that position by Certainly any means but human hands.

could have come

the storm could never have placed them there in that position. The result of this obstruction was to divert

nearly the whole

the water.

of the

A

to

the surface of the ground and to lead

it into the "basement

the house

floor of which is at a lower level than the surrounding ground, whence it descencer or percolates downwards

422/05

through interstices of the bouliers of which the embankment, is mail into the drain below. This

percolation

the

was well defined by the circular Eddies. whirlport marks left Loft sand which overlay the basement floo after the waters subsides, and it was quite clear that the perculation had

meltes and washer downward the earth in the boulier interstices and

so causes the cracks in the house.

14.

Briefly

regares the case are the following:

the main

points

مان

for the Government

(1.) that it can be mathematically

prover the smaller Belmont

drain

carr

carry off

over three

times the amount of wate. that

was les into it du

storm

by

during

the

all tributary drains.

(ii) that the Belmont drain was

through

not

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.